Sore Losers - The Movie

John Seastrom "Seas"

 

Interviews

Home

 

 

What is the film about?

I was involved in a few of the scenes as an actor, and probably just as many others behind the camera.  In addition, I spoke with Rich (writer, director, producer) many times over the years about various parts of the movie.  However, I haven’t seen the full film yet and I wasn’t privy to the whole script.  As such, I am not qualified to comment on the film as a whole.  Maybe, if (considering all of the effort I put forth to help make this movie) I were given a copy of the movie to view, I could give you a better idea of what the movie is about. 

The movie is about gambling, and its effects on people’s lives.  One of the final candidates for the name of this film was “Fuck Yourself,” if that gives you any idea as to the type of movie it is. 

 

What was it like working with the director?

Working with Rich was OK.  During the time that the bulk of the film was shot, I worked near where he lived.  I didn’t know too many people out that way, so he was really just somebody I used for lunch. 

 The joke was on me, though.  He basically didn’t talk about anything else except the fucking movie.  If you asked him how his kids were, or about his mom, or something to the effect of normal conversation, he would respond by asking you if you thought he should shove a bowling trophy or a baseball trophy up some character’s ass.  Then he’d make me pick up the check.

Doing the scenes was usually a good time.  They were either with people you’d be going out and doing something with anyway, or with people you hadn’t seen in a while and wouldn’t otherwise get a chance to see.  

 

How did you get the role and did you do any research?

Rich asked me to play a lawyer and said that he had sort of written a lawyer part with me in mind.  Acting in movies isn’t really an aspiration of mine.  I was initially hesitant to get involved in this movie.  However, Rich had been talking about it for years, I knew he was serious about it, and I was somewhat flattered that he asked me, so I agreed.  In appreciation for my cooperation, he pulled the a fast one on me, in the form of a classic bait and switch.  After I told him I would be in the movie, he said he was going to have me play a cop instead of a  lawyer.  This all came about because Rich asked Joe Pensanti, who plays my cop partner (and who eventually bailed out on the movie and left me hanging), to pick his partner.  He picked me.  Again, flattering, but a fuck job nonetheless.

I didn’t do any research; I never even really reviewed the lines until we were at the scene.  Even then, many of the lines were changed or improvised.  Before we ever got started, Rich told me in a left-handed, complimentary way, that the cop character (like the lawyer character) was basically an arrogant, cocky, belligerent prick - and then he told me to just be myself.  Again, I haven’t been deemed as enough of an important contributor to the film by Mr. Scorcese to be allowed to see the final cut, so I don’t know if I came off like the asshole that he obviously thinks I am.

 

Did you ever do any acting before?

No.

 The Director said that he thought you had one of the best performances in the film, any comment?

Oh, yeah?  Whose was better?  Again, Mr. Speilberg hasn’t gotten around to sending me a copy of the final cut, so I can’t really say. 

You can tell my character and his scenes were crucial and compelling, though, by my character’s monopolization of the Sorelosers movie trailer.  If you don’t blink, you might see me in my cop uniform, or, if you look real close in one of the gambling scenes, you might catch a glimpse of me in the background behind one of the extras at a table.  From all of the footage I’ve seen so far, which consists of the trailer, the only performance I did well was as the Invisible Man.  The Headless Horseman got more face time in his movie than I did in that trailer.

I remember when the trailer first went on the website and people started to watch it.  “I thought you were in the movie,” was probably the most common comment to me.  Runner’s up were, “Where were you?” and “I think I saw you…wait…play it again.”

 

Any future projects?

Rich is writing another script, and he said he has a part that he is writing with me in mind…sound familiar?  I am sure he will entice me by saying I be playing some desirable role and then, after things get going, relegate me to something like a guy who shovels horse shit in a stable for a living and who gets beat up and spit on by his co-workers regularly.

 

Do you have anything to say about Rich, the director/writer/producer?

All the stuff I said before is (hopefully, obviously) in a joking manner – particularly screening the movie.   I’ll see it at a film festival (one of the many that will surely accept it) like everyone else.  Rich is a good person and a good friend (and he’s not cheap as alluded to before).  He is very insightful about people and what makes them tick, which, I believe, contributed to his ability to organize all of the people involved in the film.  He also has some obvious natural talent - not just creative talent for writing (and rewriting and reworking) the script, but talent for staying focused and finishing in spite of numerous obstacles.  What he set out to do was very ambitious.  That he accomplished it deserves praise.  I wish him the best.

 

 
Watch for us in upcoming film festivals worldwide!